Sex and Gender in the Computer Graphics Research Literature

06/01/2022

∙

We survey the treatment of sex and gender in the Computer Graphics research literature from an algorithmic fairness perspective. The established practices on the use of gender and sex in our community are scientifically incorrect and constitute a form of algorithmic bias with potential harmful effects. We propose ways of addressing these as technical limitations.

READ FULL TEXT

Sex and Gender in the Computer Graphics Research Literature

Countering Racial Bias in Computer Graphics Research

Gendered Language in Resumes and its Implications for Algorithmic Bias in Hiring

Choosing an algorithmic fairness metric for an online marketplace: Detecting and quantifying algorithmic bias on LinkedIn

Mitigating Bias in Algorithmic Systems: A Fish-Eye View of Problems and Solutions Across Domains

Gender differences in beliefs about algorithmic fairness

Demographics and discussion influence views on algorithmic fairness

Wide range screening of algorithmic bias in word embedding models using large sentiment lexicons reveals underreported bias types

Sex and Gender in the Computer Graphics Research Literature

Related Research

Countering Racial Bias in Computer Graphics Research

Gendered Language in Resumes and its Implications for Algorithmic Bias in Hiring

Choosing an algorithmic fairness metric for an online marketplace: Detecting and quantifying algorithmic bias on LinkedIn

Mitigating Bias in Algorithmic Systems: A Fish-Eye View of Problems and Solutions Across Domains

Gender differences in beliefs about algorithmic fairness

Demographics and discussion influence views on algorithmic fairness

Wide range screening of algorithmic bias in word embedding models using large sentiment lexicons reveals underreported bias types