SETH Says: Weak Fréchet Distance is Faster, but only if it is Continuous and in One Dimension

07/23/2018
by   Kevin Buchin, et al.
0

We show by reduction from the Orthogonal Vectors problem that algorithms with strongly subquadratic running time cannot approximate the Fréchet distance between curves better than a factor 3 unless SETH fails. We show that similar reductions cannot achieve a lower bound with a factor better than 3. Our lower bound holds for the continuous, the discrete, and the weak discrete Fréchet distance even for curves in one dimension. Interestingly, the continuous weak Fréchet distance behaves differently. Our lower bound still holds for curves in two dimensions and higher. However, for curves in one dimension, we provide an exact algorithm to compute the weak Fréchet distance in linear time.

READ FULL TEXT

page 13

page 18

page 19

research
08/26/2022

A Subquadratic n^ε-approximation for the Continuous Fréchet Distance

The Fréchet distance is a commonly used similarity measure between curve...
research
08/28/2023

Solving Fréchet Distance Problems by Algebraic Geometric Methods

We study several polygonal curve problems under the Fréchet distance via...
research
07/15/2022

Random projections for curves in high dimensions

Modern time series analysis requires the ability to handle datasets that...
research
01/06/2022

On the Discrete Fréchet Distance in a Graph

The Fréchet distance is a well-studied similarity measure between curves...
research
04/24/2020

Fréchet Distance for Uncertain Curves

In this paper we study a wide range of variants for computing the (discr...
research
07/29/2022

Communication Complexity of Collision

The Collision problem is to decide whether a given list of numbers (x_1,...
research
03/09/2022

On Flipping the Fréchet distance

The classical and extensively-studied Fréchet distance between two curve...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset