Separation of P and NP

08/19/2021
by   Reiner Czerwinski, et al.
0

There have been many attempts to solve the P versus NP problem. However, with a new proof method, already used in arXiv:2104.14316, P not equal NP can be proved. A time limit is set for an arbitrary Turing machine and an input word is rejected on a timeout. The time limit goes toward infinity. Due to the halting problem, whether a word is accepted can only be determined at runtime. It can be shown by Rice's theorem, if a finite set of words are to be checked, they all have to be tested by brute force.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
04/28/2021

Separation of PSPACE and EXP

This article shows that PSPACE not equal EXP. A simple but novel proof t...
research
04/30/2018

Two theorems about the P versus NP problem

Two theorems about the P versus NP problem be proved in this article (1)...
research
07/08/2019

Proof compression and NP versus PSPACE. Part 2

We upgrade [1] to a complete proof of the conjecture NP = PSPACE. [1]:...
research
04/30/2020

A class of examples demonstrating that P is different from NP in the "P vs NP" problem

The CMI Millennium "P vs NP Problem" can be resolved e.g. if one shows a...
research
09/12/2018

A Simple Elementary Proof of P=NP based on the Relational Model of E. F. Codd

The P versus NP problem is studied under the relational model of E. F. C...
research
11/04/2020

Postulate-based proof of the P != NP hypothesis

The paper contains a proof for the P != NP hypothesis with the help of t...
research
03/06/2020

The Graph Limit of The Minimizer of The Onsager-Machlup Functional and Its Computation

The Onsager-Machlup (OM) functional is well-known for characterizing the...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset