Robustness Among Multiwinner Voting Rules

07/05/2017
by   Robert Bredereck, et al.
0

We investigate how robust are results of committee elections to small changes in the input preference orders, depending on the voting rules used. We find that for typical rules the effect of making a single swap of adjacent candidates in a single preference order is either that (1) at most one committee member can be replaced, or (2) it is possible that the whole committee can be replaced. We also show that the problem of computing the smallest number of swaps that lead to changing the election outcome is typically NP-hard, but there are natural FPT algorithms. Finally, for a number of rules we assess experimentally the average number of random swaps necessary to change the election result.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
06/27/2011

Manipulation of Nanson's and Baldwin's Rules

Nanson's and Baldwin's voting rules select a winner by successively elim...
research
07/11/2014

Computational Aspects of Multi-Winner Approval Voting

We study computational aspects of three prominent voting rules that use ...
research
03/27/2021

Committee Voting with Incomplete Approvals

We investigate approval-based committee voting with incomplete informati...
research
08/01/2022

Robustness of Greedy Approval Rules

We study the robustness of GreedyCC, GreedyPAV, and Phargmen's sequentia...
research
05/04/2015

Estimating the Margin of Victory of an Election using Sampling

The margin of victory of an election is a useful measure to capture the ...
research
07/27/2017

Condorcet's Principle and the Preference Reversal Paradox

We prove that every Condorcet-consistent voting rule can be manipulated ...
research
05/26/2020

Mathematics of Nested Districts: The Case of Alaska

In eight states, a "nesting rule" requires that each state Senate distri...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset