Risk-Averse Action Selection Using Extreme Value Theory Estimates of the CVaR

12/03/2019
by   Dylan Troop, et al.
0

The Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) is a useful risk measure in machine learning, finance, insurance, energy, etc. When the CVaR confidence parameter is very high, estimation by sample averaging exhibits high variance due to the limited number of samples above the corresponding threshold. To mitigate this problem, we present an estimation procedure for the CVaR that combines extreme value theory and a recently introduced method of automated threshold selection by Bader et al. (2018). Under appropriate conditions, we estimate the tail risk using a generalized Pareto distribution. We compare empirically this estimation procedure with the naive method of sample averaging, and show an improvement in accuracy for some specific cases. We also show how the estimation procedure can be used in reinforcement learning by applying our method to the multi-armed bandit problem where the goal is to avoid catastrophic risk.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
03/08/2021

Bias-Corrected Peaks-Over-Threshold Estimation of the CVaR

The conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) is a useful risk measure in fields ...
research
06/21/2023

New Bayesian method for estimation of Value at Risk and Conditional Value at Risk

Value at Risk (VaR) and Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) have become the...
research
03/01/2021

Gradient boosting for extreme quantile regression

Extreme quantile regression provides estimates of conditional quantiles ...
research
10/02/2018

Bias Reduced Peaks over Threshold Tail Estimation

In recent years several attempts have been made to extend tail modelling...
research
05/21/2019

L-moments for automatic threshold selection in extreme value analysis

In extreme value analysis, sensitivity of inference to the definition of...
research
07/01/2018

The risk function of the goodness-of-fit tests for tail models

This paper contributes to answering a question that is of crucial import...
research
01/26/2023

The Probability Conflation: A Reply

We respond to Tetlock et al. (2022) showing 1) how expert judgment fails...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset