DeepAI AI Chat
Log In Sign Up

Riposte! A Large Corpus of Counter-Arguments

by   Paul Reisert, et al.
Tohoku University

Constructive feedback is an effective method for improving critical thinking skills. Counter-arguments (CAs), one form of constructive feedback, have been proven to be useful for critical thinking skills. However, little work has been done for constructing a large-scale corpus of them which can drive research on automatic generation of CAs for fallacious micro-level arguments (i.e. a single claim and premise pair). In this work, we cast providing constructive feedback as a natural language processing task and create Riposte!, a corpus of CAs, towards this goal. Produced by crowdworkers, Riposte! contains over 18k CAs. We instruct workers to first identify common fallacy types and produce a CA which identifies the fallacy. We analyze how workers create CAs and construct a baseline model based on our analysis.


page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4


Functional Pearl: Witness Me – Constructive Arguments Must Be Guided with Concrete Witness

Beloved Curry–Howard correspondence tells that types are intuitionistic ...

Conclusion-based Counter-Argument Generation

In real-world debates, the most common way to counter an argument is to ...

Mining Arguments from Cancer Documents Using Natural Language Processing and Ontologies

In the medical domain, the continuous stream of scientific research cont...

Critical Thinking for Language Models

This paper takes a first step towards a critical thinking curriculum for...

(Seemingly) Impossible Theorems in Constructive Mathematics

We prove some constructive results that on first and maybe even on secon...

Laying the Groundwork for a Worker-Centric Peer Economy

The "gig economy" has transformed the ways in which people work, but in ...

Multilingual Counter Narrative Type Classification

The growing interest in employing counter narratives for hatred interven...