Response to "Visual Dialogue without Vision or Dialogue" (Massiceti et al., 2018)

01/16/2019
by   Abhishek Das, et al.
12

In a recent workshop paper, Massiceti et al. presented a baseline model and subsequent critique of Visual Dialog (Das et al., CVPR 2017) that raises what we believe to be unfounded concerns about the dataset and evaluation. This article intends to rebut the critique and clarify potential confusions for practitioners and future participants in the Visual Dialog challenge.

READ FULL TEXT
research
08/03/2018

Remarks on an article by Rabern et al

We show that conjecture 15 in the article by Rabern et al. is wrong, and...
research
07/25/2022

A Multi-Party Dialogue Ressource in French

We present Dialogues in Games (DinG), a corpus of manual transcriptions ...
research
01/15/2013

The Neural Representation Benchmark and its Evaluation on Brain and Machine

A key requirement for the development of effective learning representati...
research
11/04/2022

MultiWOZ-DF – A Dataflow implementation of the MultiWOZ dataset

Semantic Machines (SM) have introduced the use of the dataflow (DF) para...
research
03/28/2019

A dataset for resolving referring expressions in spoken dialogue via contextual query rewrites (CQR)

We present Contextual Query Rewrite (CQR) a dataset for multi-domain tas...
research
05/16/2017

Comments on "Gang EDF Schedulability Analysis"

This short report raises a correctness issue in the schedulability test ...
research
10/20/2019

i-RIM applied to the fastMRI challenge

We, team AImsterdam, summarize our submission to the fastMRI challenge (...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset