Replication Ethics

12/04/2017
by   Adrian Kent, et al.
0

Suppose some future technology enables the same consciously experienced human life to be repeated, identically or nearly so, N times, in series or in parallel. Is this roughly N times as valuable as enabling the same life once, because each life has value and values are additive? Or is it of roughly equal value as enabling the life once, because only one life is enabled, albeit in a physically unusual way? Does it matter whether the lives are contemporaneous or successive? We argue that these questions highlight a hitherto neglected facet of population ethics that may become relevant in the not necessarily far distant future.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
06/15/2009

What Does Artificial Life Tell Us About Death?

Short philosophical essay...
research
04/02/2017

Reprogramming Matter, Life, and Purpose

Reprogramming matter may sound far-fetched, but we have been doing it wi...
research
01/19/2021

Work Online, Welfare Calls, and Wine Night: Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Individuals' Technology Use

The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the ways many people use computational...
research
11/24/2022

Parallel Repetition for the GHZ Game: Exponential Decay

We show that the value of the n-fold repeated GHZ game is at most 2^-Ω(n...
research
06/26/2023

Sciama's argument on life in a random universe: Distinguishing apples from oranges

Dennis Sciama argued that the existence of life depended on many quantit...
research
07/24/2020

Towards Leveraging End-of-Life Tools as an Asset: Value Co-Creation based on Deep Learning in the Machining Industry

Sustainability is the key concept in the management of products that rea...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset