Ranking research institutions by the number of highly-cited articles per scientist

10/30/2018
by   Giovanni Abramo, et al.
0

In the literature and on the Web we can readily find research excellence rankings for organizations and countries by either total number of highly-cited articles (HCAs) or by ratio of HCAs to total publications. Neither are indicators of efficiency. In the current work we propose an indicator of efficiency, the number of HCAs per scientist, which can complement the productivity indicators based on impact of total output. We apply this indicator to measure excellence in the research of Italian universities as a whole, and in each field and discipline of the hard sciences.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
10/30/2018

A farewell to the MNCS and like size-independent indicators

The arguments presented demonstrate that the Mean Normalized Citation Sc...
research
12/22/2017

A proposal for a quantitative indicator of original research output

The use of quantitative indicators of scientific productivity seems now ...
research
07/04/2023

Ranking-Based Second Stage in Data Envelopment Analysis: An Application to Research Efficiency in Higher Education

An alternative approach for the panel second stage of data envelopment a...
research
10/30/2018

Are the authors of highly cited articles also the most productive ones?

Ever more frequently, governments have decided to implement policy measu...
research
09/03/2021

Validated research assessment based on highly cited researchers

Bibliometrics provides accurate, cheap and simple descriptions of resear...
research
07/03/2019

Comparison of research productivity of Italian and Norwegian professors and universities

This is the first ever attempt of application in a country other than It...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset