DeepAI AI Chat
Log In Sign Up

Rank Aggregation Using Scoring Rules

by   Niclas Boehmer, et al.

To aggregate rankings into a social ranking, one can use scoring systems such as Plurality, Veto, and Borda. We distinguish three types of methods: ranking by score, ranking by repeatedly choosing a winner that we delete and rank at the top, and ranking by repeatedly choosing a loser that we delete and rank at the bottom. The latter method captures the frequently studied voting rules Single Transferable Vote (aka Instant Runoff Voting), Coombs, and Baldwin. In an experimental analysis, we show that the three types of methods produce different rankings in practice. We also provide evidence that sequentially selecting winners is most suitable to detect the "true" ranking of candidates. For different rules in our classes, we then study the (parameterized) computational complexity of deciding in which positions a given candidate can appear in the chosen ranking. As part of our analysis, we also consider the Winner Determination problem for STV, Coombs, and Baldwin and determine their complexity when there are few voters or candidates.


page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4


Optimizing positional scoring rules for rank aggregation

Nowadays, several crowdsourcing projects exploit social choice methods f...

How to aggregate Top-lists: Score based approximation schemes

We study the aggregation of partial rankings and give a PTAS for TOP-AGG...

On absolutely and simply popular rankings

Van Zuylen et al. introduced the notion of a popular ranking in a voting...

Ranking for Relevance and Display Preferences in Complex Presentation Layouts

Learning to Rank has traditionally considered settings where given the r...

How should we score athletes and candidates: geometric scoring rules

Individual rankings are often aggregated using scoring rules: each posit...

Dynamic Proportional Rankings

Proportional ranking rules aggregate approval-style preferences of agent...

Fishing out Winners from Vote Streams

We investigate the problem of winner determination from computational so...