Quantifying Rational Belief

08/21/2009
by   Ariel Caticha, et al.
0

Some criticisms that have been raised against the Cox approach to probability theory are addressed. Should we use a single real number to measure a degree of rational belief? Can beliefs be compared? Are the Cox axioms obvious? Are there counterexamples to Cox? Rather than justifying Cox's choice of axioms we follow a different path and derive the sum and product rules of probability theory as the unique (up to regraduations) consistent representations of the Boolean AND and OR operations.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
03/27/2013

Hierarchical Evidence and Belief Functions

Dempster/Shafer (D/S) theory has been advocated as a way of representing...
research
04/14/2002

Belief Revision and Rational Inference

The (extended) AGM postulates for belief revision seem to deal with the ...
research
11/17/2017

Lattices and Their Consistent Quantification

This paper introduces the order-theoretic concept of lattices along with...
research
08/28/2010

Foundations of Inference

We present a simple and clear foundation for finite inference that unite...
research
07/22/2019

Credible Information, Allowable Information and Belief Revision – Extended Abstract

In an earlier paper [Rational choice and AGM belief revision, Artificial...
research
05/03/2012

African Trypanosomiasis Detection using Dempster-Shafer Theory

World Health Organization reports that African Trypanosomiasis affects m...
research
03/13/2013

Intuitions about Ordered Beliefs Leading to Probabilistic Models

The general use of subjective probabilities to model belief has been jus...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset