Publishing Identifiable Experiment Code And Configuration Is Important, Good and Easy

04/10/2012
by   Richard Vaughan, et al.
0

We argue for the value of publishing the exact code, configuration and data processing scripts used to produce empirical work in robotics. In particular, we recommend publishing a unique identifier for the code package in the paper itself, as a promise to the reader that this is the relavant code. We review some recent discussion of best practice for reproducibility in various professional organisations and journals, and discuss the current reward structure for publishing code in robotics, along with some ideas for improvement.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
04/29/2022

Repro: An Open-Source Library for Improving the Reproducibility and Usability of Publicly Available Research Code

We introduce Repro, an open-source library which aims at improving the r...
research
01/04/2023

Identifying Personal Data Processing for Code Review

Code review is a critical step in the software development life cycle, w...
research
01/14/2022

Interpersonal Conflicts During Code Review

Code review consists of manual inspection, discussion, and judgment of s...
research
09/01/2011

aspcud: A Linux Package Configuration Tool Based on Answer Set Programming

We present the Linux package configuration tool aspcud based on Answer S...
research
04/09/2022

A Siren Song of Open Source Reproducibility

As reproducibility becomes a greater concern, conferences have largely c...
research
09/14/2019

A Step Toward Quantifying Independently Reproducible Machine Learning Research

What makes a paper independently reproducible? Debates on reproducibilit...
research
01/20/2023

Robot Skill Learning Via Classical Robotics-Based Generated Datasets: Advantages, Disadvantages, and Future Improvement

Why do we not profit from our long-existing classical robotics knowledge...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset