Propagation of Belief Functions: A Distributed Approach

03/27/2013
by   Prakash P. Shenoy, et al.
0

In this paper, we describe a scheme for propagating belief functions in certain kinds of trees using only local computations. This scheme generalizes the computational scheme proposed by Shafer and Logan1 for diagnostic trees of the type studied by Gordon and Shortliffe, and the slightly more general scheme given by Shafer for hierarchical evidence. It also generalizes the scheme proposed by Pearl for Bayesian causal trees (see Shenoy and Shafer). Pearl's causal trees and Gordon and Shortliffe's diagnostic trees are both ways of breaking the evidence that bears on a large problem down into smaller items of evidence that bear on smaller parts of the problem so that these smaller problems can be dealt with one at a time. This localization of effort is often essential in order to make the process of probability judgment feasible, both for the person who is making probability judgments and for the machine that is combining them. The basic structure for our scheme is a type of tree that generalizes both Pearl's and Gordon and Shortliffe's trees. Trees of this general type permit localized computation in Pearl's sense. They are based on qualitative judgments of conditional independence. We believe that the scheme we describe here will prove useful in expert systems. It is now clear that the successful propagation of probabilities or certainty factors in expert systems requires much more structure than can be provided in a pure production-system framework. Bayesian schemes, on the other hand, often make unrealistic demands for structure. The propagation of belief functions in trees and more general networks stands on a middle ground where some sensible and useful things can be done. We would like to emphasize that the basic idea of local computation for propagating probabilities is due to Judea Pearl. It is a very innovative idea; we do not believe that it can be found in the Bayesian literature prior to Pearl's work. We see our contribution as extending the usefulness of Pearl's idea by generalizing it from Bayesian probabilities to belief functions. In the next section, we give a brief introduction to belief functions. The notions of qualitative independence for partitions and a qualitative Markov tree are introduced in Section III. Finally, in Section IV, we describe a scheme for propagating belief functions in qualitative Markov trees.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
04/12/2017

Beliefs in Markov Trees - From Local Computations to Local Valuation

This paper is devoted to expressiveness of hypergraphs for which uncerta...
research
03/20/2013

An Efficient Implementation of Belief Function Propagation

The local computation technique (Shafer et al. 1987, Shafer and Shenoy 1...
research
02/27/2013

An Experimental Comparison of Numerical and Qualitative Probabilistic Reasoning

Qualitative and infinitesimal probability schemes are consistent with th...
research
03/27/2013

An Axiomatic Framework for Bayesian and Belief-function Propagation

In this paper, we describe an abstract framework and axioms under which ...
research
03/13/2013

Exploring Localization in Bayesian Networks for Large Expert Systems

Current Bayesian net representations do not consider structure in the do...
research
02/14/2012

Belief Propagation by Message Passing in Junction Trees: Computing Each Message Faster Using GPU Parallelization

Compiling Bayesian networks (BNs) to junction trees and performing belie...
research
03/27/2013

Implementing a Bayesian Scheme for Revising Belief Commitments

Our previous work on classifying complex ship images [1,2] has evolved i...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset