Proof-Theoretic Semantics, a Problem with Negation and Prospects for Modality

07/29/2021
by   Nils Kürbis, et al.
0

This paper discusses proof-theoretic semantics, the project of specifying the meanings of the logical constants in terms of rules of inference governing them. I concentrate on Michael Dummett's and Dag Prawitz' philosophical motivations and give precise characterisations of the crucial notions of harmony and stability, placed in the context of proving normalisation results in systems of natural deduction. I point out a problem for defining the meaning of negation in this framework and prospects for an account of the meanings of modal operators in terms of rules of inference.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
01/05/2023

Proof-theoretic Semantics and Tactical Proof

The use of logical systems for problem-solving may be as diverse as in p...
research
07/08/2023

What is the meaning of proofs? A Fregean distinction in proof-theoretic semantics

The origins of proof-theoretic semantics lie in the question of what con...
research
01/20/2017

Logical Inferences with Contexts of RDF Triples

Logical inference, an integral feature of the Semantic Web, is the proce...
research
01/23/2011

Meaning Negotiation as Inference

Meaning negotiation (MN) is the general process with which agents reach ...
research
02/25/2023

Vagueness in Predicates and Objects

Classical semantics assumes that one can model reference, predication an...
research
07/26/2020

Recursive Rules with Aggregation: A Simple Unified Semantics

Complex reasoning problems are most clearly and easily specified using l...
research
08/29/2020

SOS Rules for Equivalences of Reaction Systems

Reaction Systems (RSs) are a successful computational framework inspired...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset