Private PAC learning implies finite Littlestone dimension

06/04/2018
by   Noga Alon, et al.
0

We show that every approximately differentially private learning algorithm (possibly improper) for a class H with Littlestone dimension d requires Ω(^*(d)) examples. As a corollary it follows that the class of thresholds over N can not be learned in a private manner; this resolves an open question due to [Bun et al. FOCS '15]. We leave as an open question whether every class with a finite Littlestone dimension can be learned by an approximately differentially private algorithm.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
03/01/2020

An Equivalence Between Private Classification and Online Prediction

We prove that every concept class with finite Littlestone dimension can ...
research
06/17/2020

Smoothed Analysis of Online and Differentially Private Learning

Practical and pervasive needs for robustness and privacy in algorithms h...
research
06/09/2023

Differentially Private All-Pairs Shortest Distances for Low Tree-Width Graphs

In this paper, we present a polynomial time algorithm for the problem of...
research
11/24/2021

Differentially Private Nonparametric Regression Under a Growth Condition

Given a real-valued hypothesis class ℋ, we investigate under what condit...
research
05/02/2019

Near Optimal Jointly Private Packing Algorithms via Dual Multiplicative Weight Update

We present an improved (ϵ, δ)-jointly differentially private algorithm f...
research
04/16/2020

Private Learning of Halfspaces: Simplifying the Construction and Reducing the Sample Complexity

We present a differentially private learner for halfspaces over a finite...
research
02/14/2021

Private learning implies quantum stability

Learning an unknown n-qubit quantum state ρ is a fundamental challenge i...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset