Predicting the Usefulness of Amazon Reviews Using Off-The-Shelf Argumentation Mining

09/21/2018
by   Marco Passon, et al.
0

Internet users generate content at unprecedented rates. Building intelligent systems capable of discriminating useful content within this ocean of information is thus becoming a urgent need. In this paper, we aim to predict the usefulness of Amazon reviews, and to do this we exploit features coming from an off-the-shelf argumentation mining system. We argue that the usefulness of a review, in fact, is strictly related to its argumentative content, whereas the use of an already trained system avoids the costly need of relabeling a novel dataset. Results obtained on a large publicly available corpus support this hypothesis.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
10/25/2018

Understanding the Role of Two-Sided Argumentation in Online Consumer Reviews: A Language-Based Perspective

This paper examines the effect of two-sided argumentation on the perceiv...
research
09/10/2019

The Longer the Better? The Interplay Between Review Length and Line of Argumentation in Online Consumer Reviews

Review helpfulness serves as focal point in understanding customers' pur...
research
05/05/2017

Crowdsourcing Argumentation Structures in Chinese Hotel Reviews

Argumentation mining aims at automatically extracting the premises-claim...
research
04/18/2017

Mining Worse and Better Opinions. Unsupervised and Agnostic Aggregation of Online Reviews

In this paper, we propose a novel approach for aggregating online review...
research
02/24/2023

VivesDebate-Speech: A Corpus of Spoken Argumentation to Leverage Audio Features for Argument Mining

In this paper, we describe VivesDebate-Speech, a corpus of spoken argume...
research
10/13/2020

Assessing the Helpfulness of Review Content for Explaining Recommendations

Despite the maturity already achieved by recommender systems algorithms,...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset