Prawitz's Conjecture is False; So What?

05/16/2023
by   Will Stafford, et al.
0

Several recent results bring into focus the superintuitionistic nature of most notions of proof-theoretic validity, but little work has been done evaluating the consequences of these results. Proof-theoretic validity claims to offer a formal explication of how inferences follow from the definitions of logic connectives (which are defined by their introduction rules). This paper explores whether the new results undermine this claim. It is argued that, while the formal results are worrying, superintuitionistic inferences are valid because the treatments of atomic formulas are insufficiently general, and a resolution to this issue is proposed.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
04/27/2021

Coinductive Validity

This note formally defines the concept of coinductive validity of judgem...
research
02/17/2023

Categorical Proof-Theoretic Semantics

In proof-theoretic semantics, model-theoretic validity is replaced by pr...
research
10/11/2022

From Proof-theoretic Validity to Base-extension Semantics for Intuitionistic Propositional Logic

There are two major approaches to proof-theoretic semantics: proof-theor...
research
11/09/2021

Enumerating Independent Linear Inferences

A linear inference is a valid inequality of Boolean algebra in which eac...
research
11/28/2019

Two Formal Systems of the λδ Family Revised

We present the framework λδ-2B that significantly improves and generaliz...
research
12/25/2021

Inferential models and the decision-theoretic implications of the validity property

Inferential models (IMs) are data-dependent, probability-like structures...
research
01/20/2017

Logical Inferences with Contexts of RDF Triples

Logical inference, an integral feature of the Semantic Web, is the proce...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset