Plausibility and probability in deductive reasoning

08/29/2017
by   Andrew MacFie, et al.
0

We consider the problem of rational uncertainty about unproven mathematical statements, which Gödel and others have remarked on. Using Bayesian-inspired arguments we build a normative model of fair bets under deductive uncertainty which draws from both probability and the theory of algorithms. We comment on connections to Zeilberger's notion of "semi-rigorous proofs", particularly that inherent subjectivity is an obstacle.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
04/14/2021

Uncertainty measures: The big picture

Probability theory is far from being the most general mathematical theor...
research
03/31/2020

Explosive Proofs of Mathematical Truths

Mathematical proofs are both paradigms of certainty and some of the most...
research
03/27/2013

Rational Nonmonotonic Reasoning

Nonmonotonic reasoning is a pattern of reasoning that allows an agent to...
research
08/01/2017

A Labelling Framework for Probabilistic Argumentation

The combination of argumentation and probability paves the way to new ac...
research
05/20/2019

Naive probability

We describe a rational, but low resolution model of probability....
research
11/23/2015

What is the plausibility of probability?(revised 2003, 2015)

We present and examine a result related to uncertainty reasoning, namely...
research
03/27/2013

Strong & Weak Methods: A Logical View of Uncertainty

The last few years has seen a growing debate about techniques for managi...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset