Performance of the Survey Propagation-guided decimation algorithm for the random NAE-K-SAT problem
share
We show that the Survey Propagation-guided decimation algorithm fails to find satisfying assignments on random instances of the "Not-All-Equal-K-SAT" problem if the number of message passing iterations is bounded by a constant independent of the size of the instance and the clause-to-variable ratio is above (1+o_K(1))2^K-1 K^2 K for sufficiently large K. Our analysis in fact applies to a broad class of algorithms described as "sequential local algorithms". Such algorithms iteratively set variables based on some local information and then recurse on the reduced instance. Survey Propagation-guided as well as Belief Propagation-guided decimation algorithms - two widely studied message passing based algorithms, fall under this category of algorithms provided the number of message passing iterations is bounded by a constant. Another well-known algorithm falling into this category is the Unit Clause algorithm. Our work constitutes the first rigorous analysis of the performance of the SP-guided decimation algorithm. The approach underlying our paper is based on an intricate geometry of the solution space of random NAE-K-SAT problem. We show that above the (1+o_K(1))2^K-1 K^2 K threshold, the overlap structure of m-tuples of satisfying assignments exhibit a certain clustering behavior expressed in the form of constraints on distances between the m assignments, for appropriately chosen m. We further show that if a sequential local algorithm succeeds in finding a satisfying assignment with probability bounded away from zero, then one can construct an m-tuple of solutions violating these constraints, thus leading to a contradiction. Along with (citation), this result is the first work which directly links the clustering property of random constraint satisfaction problems to the computational hardness of finding satisfying assignments.
READ FULL TEXT