Penalty logic and its Link with Dempster-Shafer Theory

Penalty logic, introduced by Pinkas, associates to each formula of a knowledge base the price to pay if this formula is violated. Penalties may be used as a criterion for selecting preferred consistent subsets in an inconsistent knowledge base, thus inducing a non-monotonic inference relation. A precise formalization and the main properties of penalty logic and of its associated non-monotonic inference relation are given in the first part. We also show that penalty logic and Dempster-Shafer theory are related, especially in the infinitesimal case.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
06/01/2021

On the KLM properties of a fuzzy DL with Typicality

The paper investigates the properties of a fuzzy logic of typicality. Th...
research
05/26/2020

Nonmonotonic Inferences with Qualitative Conditionals based on Preferred Structures on Worlds

A conditional knowledge base R is a set of conditionals of the form "If ...
research
06/03/2011

Semantics for Possibilistic Disjunctive Programs

In this paper, a possibilistic disjunctive logic programming approach fo...
research
07/11/2011

Advancing Multi-Context Systems by Inconsistency Management

Multi-Context Systems are an expressive formalism to model (possibly) no...
research
02/04/2014

Identifying the Class of Maxi-Consistent Operators in Argumentation

Dung's abstract argumentation theory can be seen as a general framework ...
research
12/16/2020

On Exploiting Hitting Sets for Model Reconciliation

In human-aware planning, a planning agent may need to provide an explana...
research
10/09/2019

A Query-Driven Decision Procedure for Distributed Autoepistemic Logic with Inductive Definitions

Distributed Autoepistemic Logic with Inductive Definitions (dAEL(ID)) is...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset