PDDL2.1 - The Art of the Possible? Commentary on Fox and Long

09/26/2011
by   D. McDermott, et al.
0

PDDL2.1 was designed to push the envelope of what planning algorithms can do, and it has succeeded. It adds two important features: durative actions,which take time (and may have continuous effects); and objective functions for measuring the quality of plans. The concept of durative actions is flawed; and the treatment of their semantics reveals too strong an attachment to the way many contemporary planners work. Future PDDL innovators should focus on producing a clean semantics for additions to the language, and let planner implementers worry about coupling their algorithms to problems expressed in the latest version of the language.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
11/17/2018

Learning Features and Abstract Actions for Computing Generalized Plans

Generalized planning is concerned with the computation of plans that sol...
research
04/17/2013

h-approximation: History-Based Approximation of Possible World Semantics as ASP

We propose an approximation of the Possible Worlds Semantics (PWS) for a...
research
06/01/2011

Partial-Order Planning with Concurrent Interacting Actions

In order to generate plans for agents with multiple actuators, agent tea...
research
06/30/2011

Taming Numbers and Durations in the Model Checking Integrated Planning System

The Model Checking Integrated Planning System (MIPS) is a temporal least...
research
09/03/2009

On Planning with Preferences in HTN

In this paper, we address the problem of generating preferred plans by c...
research
03/16/2023

Multi-step planning with learned effects of (possibly partial) action executions

In this paper, we propose an affordance model, which is built on Conditi...
research
03/30/2022

Continuous Integration of Data Histories into Consistent Namespaces

We describe a policy-based approach to the scaling of shared data servic...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset