PDDL 2.1: Representation vs. Computation

10/12/2011
by   H. A. Geffner, et al.
0

I comment on the PDDL 2.1 language and its use in the planning competition, focusing on the choices made for accommodating time and concurrency. I also discuss some methodological issues that have to do with the move toward more expressive planning languages and the balance needed in planning research between semantics and computation.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
06/24/2011

SHOP2: An HTN Planning System

The SHOP2 planning system received one of the awards for distinguished p...
research
10/12/2011

The Power of Modeling - a Response to PDDL2.1

In this commentary I argue that although PDDL is a very useful standard ...
research
06/22/2011

PDDL2.1: An Extension to PDDL for Expressing Temporal Planning Domains

In recent years research in the planning community has moved increasingl...
research
12/29/2022

Planning with Complex Data Types in PDDL

Practically all of the planning research is limited to states represente...
research
06/07/2022

Position Paper: Online Modeling for Offline Planning

The definition and representation of planning problems is at the heart o...
research
06/26/2011

The Metric-FF Planning System: Translating "Ignoring Delete Lists" to Numeric State Variables

Planning with numeric state variables has been a challenge for many year...
research
10/29/2015

My Reflections on the First Man vs. Machine No-Limit Texas Hold 'em Competition

The first ever human vs. computer no-limit Texas hold 'em competition to...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset