PALS: Plesiochronous and Locally Synchronous Systems
share
Consider an arbitrary network of communicating modules on a chip, each requiring a local signal telling it when to execute a computational step. There are three common solutions to generating such a local clock signal: (i) by deriving it from a single, central clock source, (ii) by local, free-running oscillators, or (iii) by handshaking between neighboring modules. Conceptually, each of these solutions is the result of a perceived dichotomy in which (sub)systems are either clocked or fully asynchronous, suggesting that the designer's choice is limited to deciding where to draw the line between synchronous and asynchronous design. In contrast, we take the view that the better question to ask is how synchronous the system can and should be. Based on a distributed clock synchronization algorithm, we present a novel design providing modules with local clocks whose frequency bounds are almost as good as those of corresponding free-running oscillators, yet neighboring modules are guaranteed to have a phase offset substantially smaller than one clock cycle. Concretely, parameters obtained from a 15nm ASIC implementation running at 2GHz yield mathematical worst-case bounds of 30ps on phase offset for a 32x32 node grid network.
READ FULL TEXT
