PAC-Reasoning in Relational Domains

03/15/2018
by   Ondrej Kuzelka, et al.
0

We consider the problem of predicting plausible missing facts in relational data, given a set of imperfect logical rules. In particular, our aim is to provide bounds on the (expected) number of incorrect inferences that are made in this way. Since for classical inference it is in general impossible to bound this number in a non-trivial way, we consider two inference relations that weaken, but remain close in spirit to classical inference.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
09/03/2018

Exploring the Landscape of Relational Syllogistic Logics

This paper explores relational syllogistic logics, a family of logical s...
research
04/01/2009

Safe Reasoning Over Ontologies

As ontologies proliferate and automatic reasoners become more powerful, ...
research
01/02/2020

Non-Parametric Learning of Gaifman Models

We consider the problem of structure learning for Gaifman models and lea...
research
03/25/2022

Learning Relational Rules from Rewards

Humans perceive the world in terms of objects and relations between them...
research
04/07/2020

Guessing What's Plausible But Remembering What's True: Accurate Neural Reasoning for Question-Answering

Neural approaches to natural language processing (NLP) often fail at the...
research
10/24/2022

Abductive Action Inference

Abductive reasoning aims to make the most likely inference for a given s...
research
05/19/2021

Complementary Structure-Learning Neural Networks for Relational Reasoning

The neural mechanisms supporting flexible relational inferences, especia...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset