P≠ NP

03/22/2020
by   Tianrong Lin, et al.
0

The whole discussion is divided into two parts: one is for |Σ|≥ 2 (general case), and another is for |Σ|=1 (special case). The main contribution of the paper is that a series of results are obtained. Specifically, we prove in general case that : (1) There exists a language AL∈ NP-P, for any language L∈ P, the lower bound on reducibility from AL to L is Ω(m^n) where m≥ 2 is a constant, n=|ω| and ω∈Σ^* the input; (2) There exists no polynomial-time algorithm for SAT; (3) An immediate corollary of (1) and (2) is that P≠ NP, which also can be deduced from (6); (4) There exists a language coAL∈ coNP-coP, for any language L∈ coP, the lower bound on reducibility from coAL to L is Ω(m^n) where m≥ 2 is a constant, n=|ω| and ω∈Σ^* the input; (5) There exists no polynomial-time algorithm for TAUT; (6) An immediate corollary of (4) and (5) is that coP≠ coNP; We next study the problem in special case. It is shown that: (1) there exists k∈ℕ and a reducibility φ from an arbitrary language L_1∈ NP-P (resp. L_1∈ coNP-coP) to an another arbitrary language L_2∈ P (resp. L_2∈ coP) such that T_φ(n)≤ n^k+k where n=|ω| and ω∈Σ^n is the input; (2) an immediate corollary is that P=NP and coP=coNP in the special case.

READ FULL TEXT

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset
Success!
Error Icon An error occurred

Sign in with Google

×

Use your Google Account to sign in to DeepAI

×

Consider DeepAI Pro