Opportunity costs in the game of best choice

03/05/2019
by   Madeline Crews, et al.
0

The game of best choice, also known as the secretary problem, is a model for sequential decision making with many variations in the literature. Notably, the classical setup assumes that the sequence of candidate rankings is uniformly distributed over time and that there is no expense associated with the candidate interviews. Here, we weight each ranking permutation according to the position of the best candidate in order to model costs incurred from conducting interviews with candidates that are ultimately not hired. We compare our weighted model with the classical (uniform) model via a limiting process. It turns out that imposing even infinitesimal costs on the interviews results in a probability of success that is about 28 classical case.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
02/26/2019

Weighted games of best choice

The game of best choice (also known as the secretary problem) is a model...
research
11/16/2020

Finding the Second-Best Candidate under the Mallows Model

The well-known secretary problem in sequential analysis and optimal stop...
research
07/09/2020

Line-Up Elections: Parallel Voting with Shared Candidate Pool

We introduce the model of line-up elections which captures parallel or s...
research
11/13/2022

The Weighted Markov-Dubins Problem

In this article, a variation of the classical Markov-Dubins problem is c...
research
09/08/2019

What You See Is What You Get? The Impact of Representation Criteria on Human Bias in Hiring

Although systematic biases in decision-making are widely documented, the...
research
09/14/2021

Targeted Cross-Validation

In many applications, we have access to the complete dataset but are onl...
research
02/29/2020

Who Wins the Game of Thrones? How Sentiments Improve the Prediction of Candidate Choice

This paper analyzes how candidate choice prediction improves by differen...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset