Open Science and Authorship of Supplementary Material. Evidence from a Research Community

by   Andrea Mannocci, et al.

Authorship of scientific articles has profoundly changed from early science until now. While once upon a time a paper was authored by a handful of authors, scientific collaborations are much more prominent on average nowadays. As authorship (and citation) is essentially the primary reward mechanism according to the traditional research evaluation frameworks, it turned out to be a rather hot-button topic from which a significant portion of academic disputes stems. However, the novel Open Science practices could be an opportunity to disrupt such dynamics and diversify the credit of the different scientific contributors involved in the diverse phases of the lifecycle of the same research effort. In fact, a paper and research data (or software) contextually published could exhibit different authorship to give credit to the various contributors right where it feels most appropriate. As a preliminary study, in this paper, we leverage the wealth of information contained in Open Science Graphs, such as OpenAIRE, and conduct a focused analysis on a subset of publications with supplementary material drawn from the European Marine Science (MES) research community. The results are promising and suggest our hypothesis is worth exploring further as we registered in 22 between the authors participating in the publication and the authors participating in the supplementary dataset (or software), thus posing the premises for a longitudinal, large-scale analysis of the phenomenon.


page 1

page 4


Will open science change authorship for good? Towards a quantitative analysis

Authorship of scientific articles has profoundly changed from early scie...

Jupyter notebooks as discovery mechanisms for open science: Citation practices in the astronomy community

Citing data and software is a means to give scholarly credit and to faci...

On the evaluation of research software: the CDUR procedure

Background: Evaluation of the quality of research software is a challeng...

Publishing computational research – A review of infrastructures for reproducible and transparent scholarly communication

The trend toward open science increases the pressure on authors to provi...

Collective authorship in Ukrainian science: marginal effect or new phenomenon?

One of the features of modern science is the formation of stable large c...

On the rules of science game

Credit allocation in the mainstream bibliometrics is fundamentally flawe...

Normative versus strategic accounts of acknowledgment data: the case of the top-five journals of economics

Two alternative accounts can be given of the information contained in th...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset