On weakly informative prior distributions for the heterogeneity parameter in Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis

by   Christian Röver, et al.

The normal-normal hierarchical model (NNHM) constitutes a simple and widely used framework for meta-analysis. In the common case of only few studies contributing to the meta-analysis, standard approaches to inference tend to perform poorly, and Bayesian meta-analysis has been suggested as a potential solution. The Bayesian approach, however, requires the sensible specification of prior distributions. While non-informative priors are commonly used for the overall mean effect, the use of weakly informative priors has been suggested for the heterogeneity parameter, in particular in the setting of (very) few studies. To date, however, a consensus on how to generally specify a weakly informative heterogeneity prior is lacking. Here we investigate the problem more closely and provide some guidance on prior specification.


Summarizing empirical information on between-study heterogeneity for Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis

In Bayesian meta-analysis, the specification of prior probabilities for ...

Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis using the bayesmeta R package

The random-effects or normal-normal hierarchical model is commonly utili...

Bayesian Model-Averaged Meta-Analysis in Medicine

We outline a Bayesian model-averaged meta-analysis for standardized mean...

Applying Meta-Analytic Predictive Priors with the R Bayesian evidence synthesis tools

Use of historical data in clinical trial design and analysis has shown v...

Double arcsine transform not appropriate for meta-analysis

The variance-stabilizing Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transform was orig...

Intuitive principle-based priors for attributing variance in additive model structures

Variance parameters in additive models are often assigned independent pr...

Power Priors for Replication Studies

The ongoing replication crisis in science has increased interest in the ...