On true versus estimated propensity scores for treatment effect estimation with discrete controls

05/18/2023
by   Andrew Herren, et al.
0

The finite sample variance of an inverse propensity weighted estimator is derived in the case of discrete control variables with finite support. The obtained expressions generally corroborate widely-cited asymptotic theory showing that estimated propensity scores are superior to true propensity scores in the context of inverse propensity weighting. However, similar analysis of a modified estimator demonstrates that foreknowledge of the true propensity function can confer a statistical advantage when estimating average treatment effects.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
11/17/2020

Debiased Inverse Propensity Score Weighting for Estimation of Average Treatment Effects with High-Dimensional Confounders

We consider estimation of average treatment effects given observational ...
research
09/23/2020

On IPW-based estimation of conditional average treatment effect

The research in this paper gives a systematic investigation on the asymp...
research
11/24/2020

On variance of the treatment effect in the treated using inverse probability weighting

In the analysis of observational studies, inverse probability weighting ...
research
04/01/2019

A Regression Discontinuity Design for Ordinal Running Variables: Evaluating Central Bank Purchases of Corporate Bonds

We propose a regression discontinuity design which can be employed when ...
research
09/14/2020

Semi-supervised learning and the question of true versus estimated propensity scores

A straightforward application of semi-supervised machine learning to the...
research
07/19/2023

The Connection Between R-Learning and Inverse-Variance Weighting for Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects

Our motivation is to shed light the performance of the widely popular "R...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset