On the share of mathematics published by Elsevier and Springer

05/13/2019
by   Jean-Christophe Mourrat, et al.
0

For-profit editors such as Elsevier and Springer have been subject to sustained criticism from academics and university libraries, including calls to boycott, and discontinued subscriptions. Mathematicians have played a particularly active role in this critique, and have endeavored to imagine new publication practices and create new journals. This motivates the monitoring of the share of articles published by different editors. I used data from MathSciNet over the period 2000-2017, and focused on the 100 journals with highest citations per article. Within this category, the share of articles published by Elsevier and Springer has steadily increased over this period, from about a third to almost half of the total.

READ FULL TEXT
research
05/06/2020

Building Journal Impact Factor Quartile into the Assessment of Academic Performance: A Case Study

This study aims to provide information about the Q Concept defined as th...
research
06/06/2017

Publication Trends in Physics Education: A Bibliometric study

A publication trend in Physics Education by employing bibliometric analy...
research
04/21/2023

Text2Time: Transformer-based Article Time Period Prediction

The task of predicting the publication period of text documents, such as...
research
02/14/2018

The influence of online posting dates on the bibliometric indicators of scientific articles

This article analyses the difference in timing between the online availa...
research
02/09/2021

Transparency to hybrid open access through publisher-provided metadata: An article-level study of Elsevier

With the growth of open access (OA), the financial flows in scholarly jo...
research
08/10/2021

How near-duplicate detection improves editors' and authors' publishing experience

We describe a system that helps identify manuscripts submitted to multip...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset