On the rules of science game

04/19/2020
by   Endel Poder, et al.
0

Credit allocation in the mainstream bibliometrics is fundamentally flawed and the popular indicators have been misleading science for decades. Originally a simple technical mistake has become an integral part of our culture and is very difficult to correct. Although the problem has been raised in scientific articles, it seems mostly unknown to wider audience.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

research
12/07/2020

Bibliometrics in Press. Representations and Uses of Bibliometric Indicators in the Italian Daily Newspapers

Scholars in science and technology studies and bibliometricians are incr...
research
07/07/2022

Will open science change authorship for good? Towards a quantitative analysis

Authorship of scientific articles has profoundly changed from early scie...
research
10/05/2017

Eugene Garfield's Scholarly Impact: A Scientometric Review

The concept of citation indexing has become deeply involved in many part...
research
07/06/2022

Open Science and Authorship of Supplementary Material. Evidence from a Research Community

Authorship of scientific articles has profoundly changed from early scie...
research
11/01/2018

Interdisciplinarity: A Nobel Opportunity

Interdisciplinary collaborations now sweep most fields of the natural an...
research
01/25/2021

Democratizing information visualization. A study to map the value of graphic design to easier knowledge transfer of scientific research

Visual representations are becoming important in science communication a...
research
02/10/2020

A Novel Kuhnian Ontology for Epistemic Classification of STM Scholarly Articles

Thomas Kuhn proposed his paradigmatic view of scientific discovery five ...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset