On the Relative Expressiveness of Argumentation Frameworks, Normal Logic Programs and Abstract Dialectical Frameworks

05/05/2014
by   Hannes Strass, et al.
0

We analyse the expressiveness of the two-valued semantics of abstract argumentation frameworks, normal logic programs and abstract dialectical frameworks. By expressiveness we mean the ability to encode a desired set of two-valued interpretations over a given propositional signature using only atoms from that signature. While the computational complexity of the two-valued model existence problem for all these languages is (almost) the same, we show that the languages form a neat hierarchy with respect to their expressiveness.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
09/24/2018

A Preliminary Report on Probabilistic Attack Normal Form for Constellation Semantics

After Dung's founding work in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks there ha...
research
06/12/2023

Argumentative Characterizations of (Extended) Disjunctive Logic Programs

This paper continues an established line of research about the relations...
research
10/18/2021

A Formalisation of Abstract Argumentation in Higher-Order Logic

We present an approach for representing abstract argumentation framework...
research
07/22/2019

On the Equivalence Between Abstract Dialectical Frameworks and Logic Programs

Abstract Dialectical Frameworks (ADFs) are argumentation frameworks wher...
research
09/12/2023

Games and Argumentation: Time for a Family Reunion!

The rule "defeated(X) ← attacks(Y,X), defeated(Y)" states that an argum...
research
03/31/2016

Characterizing Realizability in Abstract Argumentation

Realizability for knowledge representation formalisms studies the follow...
research
03/05/2019

Complexity Results and Algorithms for Bipolar Argumentation

Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (BAFs) admit several interpretations of...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset