On the Predictive Power of Neural Language Models for Human Real-Time Comprehension Behavior

by   Ethan Gotlieb Wilcox, et al.

Human reading behavior is tuned to the statistics of natural language: the time it takes human subjects to read a word can be predicted from estimates of the word's probability in context. However, it remains an open question what computational architecture best characterizes the expectations deployed in real time by humans that determine the behavioral signatures of reading. Here we test over two dozen models, independently manipulating computational architecture and training dataset size, on how well their next-word expectations predict human reading time behavior on naturalistic text corpora. We find that across model architectures and training dataset sizes the relationship between word log-probability and reading time is (near-)linear. We next evaluate how features of these models determine their psychometric predictive power, or ability to predict human reading behavior. In general, the better a model's next-word expectations, the better its psychometric predictive power. However, we find nontrivial differences across model architectures. For any given perplexity, deep Transformer models and n-gram models generally show superior psychometric predictive power over LSTM or structurally supervised neural models, especially for eye movement data. Finally, we compare models' psychometric predictive power to the depth of their syntactic knowledge, as measured by a battery of syntactic generalization tests developed using methods from controlled psycholinguistic experiments. Once perplexity is controlled for, we find no significant relationship between syntactic knowledge and predictive power. These results suggest that different approaches may be required to best model human real-time language comprehension behavior in naturalistic reading versus behavior for controlled linguistic materials designed for targeted probing of syntactic knowledge.


page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4


A Neural Model of Adaptation in Reading

It has been argued that humans rapidly adapt their lexical and syntactic...

Expectations over Unspoken Alternatives Predict Pragmatic Inferences

Scalar inferences (SI) are a signature example of how humans interpret l...

Transformer-Based LM Surprisal Predicts Human Reading Times Best with About Two Billion Training Tokens

Recent psycholinguistic studies have drawn conflicting conclusions about...

Language Models Explain Word Reading Times Better Than Empirical Predictability

Though there is a strong consensus that word length and frequency are th...

Interpreting Attention Models with Human Visual Attention in Machine Reading Comprehension

While neural networks with attention mechanisms have achieved superior p...

Why Does Surprisal From Larger Transformer-Based Language Models Provide a Poorer Fit to Human Reading Times?

This work presents a detailed linguistic analysis into why larger Transf...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset