On the homogeneity of measures for binary associations

10/11/2022
by   Linbo Wang, et al.
0

Applied researchers often claim that the risk difference is more heterogeneous than the relative risk and the odds ratio. Some also argue that there are theoretical grounds for why this claim is true. In this note, we point out that these arguments reflect certain effect measures are variation independent of a nuisance parameter that is easier to interpret, rather than the homogeneity of these measures.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
05/15/2021

Disagreement Concerning Effect-Measure Modification

Stratifying factors, like age and gender, can modify the effect of treat...
research
06/04/2021

Odds Ratios are far from "portable": A call to use realistic models for effect variation in meta-analysis

Objective: Recently Doi et al. argued that risk ratios should be replace...
research
06/14/2019

Epistemic Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning

We develop a framework for interacting with uncertain environments in re...
research
08/31/2021

Comments on The clinical meaningfulness of a treatment's effect on a time-to-event variable

Some years ago, Snapinn and Jiang[1] considered the interpretation and p...
research
05/27/2020

On the Monotonicity of a Nondifferentially Mismeasured Binary Confounder

Suppose that we are interested in the average causal effect of a binary ...
research
12/26/2019

Pareto models for risk management

The Pareto model is very popular in risk management, since simple analyt...
research
12/09/2019

Optimal reinsurance for risk over surplus ratios

Optimal reinsurance when Value at Risk and expected surplus is balanced ...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset