On the assumption of independent right censoring

05/07/2019
by   Morten Overgaard, et al.
0

Various assumptions on a right-censoring mechanism to ensure consistency of the Kaplan--Meier and Aalen--Johansen estimators in a competing risks setting are studied. Specifically, eight different assumptions are seen to fall in two categories: a weaker identifiability assumption, which is the weakest possible assumption in a precise sense, and a stronger representativity assumption which ensures the existence of an independent censoring time. When a given censoring time is considered, similar assumptions can be made on the censoring time. This allows for a characterization of so-called pointwise independence as well as full independence of censoring time and event time and type. Examples illustrate how the various assumptions differ.

READ FULL TEXT

Authors

page 15

10/27/2020

A Weaker Faithfulness Assumption based on Triple Interactions

One of the core assumptions in causal discovery is the faithfulness assu...
05/04/2022

Choosing Exogeneity Assumptions in Potential Outcome Models

There are many kinds of exogeneity assumptions. How should researchers c...
03/10/2019

Stackelberg Independence

The standard model of sequential capacity choices is the Stackelberg qua...
10/09/2020

Causal inference for semi-competing risks data

An emerging challenge for time-to-event data is studying semi-competing ...
07/18/2005

Pattern Recognition for Conditionally Independent Data

In this work we consider the task of relaxing the i.i.d assumption in pa...
08/27/2018

Learning from Positive and Unlabeled Data under the Selected At Random Assumption

For many interesting tasks, such as medical diagnosis and web page class...
03/30/2019

Asymptotic nonparametric statistical analysis of stationary time series

Stationarity is a very general, qualitative assumption, that can be asse...
This week in AI

Get the week's most popular data science and artificial intelligence research sent straight to your inbox every Saturday.