On Multi-Cause Causal Inference with Unobserved Confounding: Counterexamples, Impossibility, and Alternatives

02/27/2019
by   Alexander D'Amour, et al.
0

Unobserved confounding is a central barrier to drawing causal inferences from observational data. Several authors have recently proposed that this barrier can be overcome in the case where one attempts to infer the effects of several variables simultaneously. In this paper, we present two simple, analytical counterexamples that challenge the general claims that are central to these approaches. In addition, we show that nonparametric identification is impossible in this setting. We discuss practical implications, and suggest alternatives to the methods that have been proposed so far in this line or work: using proxy variables and shifting focus to sensitivity analysis.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
07/31/2019

Multi-cause causal inference with unmeasured confounding and binary outcome

Unobserved confounding presents a major threat to causal inference in ob...
research
02/13/2023

Single Proxy Control

Negative control variables are sometimes used in non-experimental studie...
research
08/15/2021

The Proximal ID Algorithm

Unobserved confounding is a fundamental obstacle to establishing valid c...
research
05/30/2019

Multiple Causes: A Causal Graphical View

Unobserved confounding is a major hurdle for causal inference from obser...
research
12/12/2020

On Proximal Causal Learning with Many Hidden Confounders

We generalize the proximal g-formula of Miao, Geng, and Tchetgen Tchetge...
research
01/30/2023

Integrating Earth Observation Data into Causal Inference: Challenges and Opportunities

Observational studies require adjustment for confounding factors that ar...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset