On "Indifference" and Backward Induction in Games with Perfect Information

07/08/2023
by   Nimrod Megiddo, et al.
0

Indifference of a player with respect to two distinct outcomes of a game cannot be handled by small perturbations, because the actual choice may have significant impact on other players, and cause them to act in a way that has significant impact of the indifferent player. It is argued that ties among rational choices can be resolved by refinements of the concept of rationality based on the utilities of other players. One such refinement is the concept of Tit-for-Tat.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
02/07/2018

The dynamic framework of decision-making

This work explores dynamics existing in interactions between players. Th...
research
01/26/2021

Liberalism, rationality, and Pareto optimality

Rational players in game theory are neoliberal in the sense that they ca...
research
08/17/2020

Information theory and player deck choice in online Collectable Card Games

Using three years of player data of the online Collectible Card Game Hea...
research
07/28/2022

Graph Neural Networks to Predict Sports Outcomes

Predicting outcomes in sports is important for teams, leagues, bettors, ...
research
12/29/2021

Tired of Misattribution, Modeling Player Fatigue in the NBA

The prevailing belief propagated by NBA league observers is that the wor...
research
07/27/2017

What Drives People's Choices in Turn-Taking Games, if not Game-Theoretic Rationality?

In an earlier experiment, participants played a perfect information game...
research
09/29/2021

Resource sharing on endogenous networks

We examine behavior in a voluntary resource sharing game that incorporat...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset