On Fair Selection in the Presence of Implicit and Differential Variance

12/10/2021
by   Vitalii Emelianov, et al.
0

Discrimination in selection problems such as hiring or college admission is often explained by implicit bias from the decision maker against disadvantaged demographic groups. In this paper, we consider a model where the decision maker receives a noisy estimate of each candidate's quality, whose variance depends on the candidate's group – we argue that such differential variance is a key feature of many selection problems. We analyze two notable settings: in the first, the noise variances are unknown to the decision maker who simply picks the candidates with the highest estimated quality independently of their group; in the second, the variances are known and the decision maker picks candidates having the highest expected quality given the noisy estimate. We show that both baseline decision makers yield discrimination, although in opposite directions: the first leads to underrepresentation of the low-variance group while the second leads to underrepresentation of the high-variance group. We study the effect on the selection utility of imposing a fairness mechanism that we term the γ-rule (it is an extension of the classical four-fifths rule and it also includes demographic parity). In the first setting (with unknown variances), we prove that under mild conditions, imposing the γ-rule increases the selection utility – here there is no trade-off between fairness and utility. In the second setting (with known variances), imposing the γ-rule decreases the utility but we prove a bound on the utility loss due to the fairness mechanism.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
06/24/2020

On Fair Selection in the Presence of Implicit Variance

Quota-based fairness mechanisms like the so-called Rooney rule or four-f...
research
05/24/2022

Fairness in Selection Problems with Strategic Candidates

To better understand discriminations and the effect of affirmative actio...
research
05/27/2019

Efficient candidate screening under multiple tests and implications for fairness

When recruiting job candidates, employers rarely observe their underlyin...
research
10/21/2020

The Effect of the Rooney Rule on Implicit Bias in the Long Term

A robust body of evidence demonstrates the adverse effects of implicit b...
research
01/31/2023

On the Within-Group Discrimination of Screening Classifiers

Screening classifiers are increasingly used to identify qualified candid...
research
01/04/2018

Selection Problems in the Presence of Implicit Bias

Over the past two decades, the notion of implicit bias has come to serve...
research
02/03/2022

Selection in the Presence of Implicit Bias: The Advantage of Intersectional Constraints

In selection processes such as hiring, promotion, and college admissions...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset