On Estimating Multiple Treatment Effects with Regression

06/09/2021
by   Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham, et al.
0

We study the causal interpretation of regressions on multiple dependent treatments and flexible controls. Such regressions are often used to analyze randomized control trials with multiple intervention arms, and to estimate institutional quality (e.g. teacher value-added) with observational data. We show that, unlike with a single binary treatment, these regressions do not generally estimate convex averages of causal effects-even when the treatments are conditionally randomly assigned and the controls fully address omitted variables bias. We discuss different solutions to this issue, and propose as a solution anew class of efficient estimators of weighted average treatment effects.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
02/07/2022

Causal inference from treatment-control studies having an additional factor with unknown assignment mechanism

Consider a situation with two treatments, the first of which is randomiz...
research
12/31/2020

Breaking Ties: Regression Discontinuity Design Meets Market Design

Many schools in large urban districts have more applicants than seats. C...
research
09/01/2018

Matching Estimators for Causal Effects of Multiple Treatments

Matching estimators for average treatment effects are widely used in the...
research
01/11/2019

The Estimation of Causal Effects of Multiple Treatments in Observational Studies Using Bayesian Additive Regression Trees

There is currently a dearth of appropriate methods to estimate the causa...
research
05/03/2021

What can the millions of random treatments in nonexperimental data reveal about causes?

We propose a new method to estimate causal effects from nonexperimental ...
research
02/01/2020

Natural Experiments

The term natural experiment is used inconsistently. In one interpretatio...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset