On Defining 'I' "I logy"

06/06/2009
by   Farzad Didehvar, et al.
0

Could we define I? Throughout this article we give a negative answer to this question. More exactly, we show that there is no definition for I in a certain way. But this negative answer depends on our definition of definability. Here, we try to consider sufficient generalized definition of definability. In the middle of paper a paradox will arise which makes us to modify the way we use the concept of property and definability.

READ FULL TEXT
research
11/05/2019

On Generalized Regularity

Szemeredi's regularity lemma is one instance in a family of regularity l...
research
10/18/2021

Using Structure-Behavior Coalescence Method for Systems Definition 2.0

Systems definition is an artifact created by humans to describe what a s...
research
12/09/2020

The Counterfactual NESS Definition of Causation

In previous work with Joost Vennekens I proposed a definition of actual ...
research
12/19/2013

Giving the AI definition a form suitable for the engineer

Artificial Intelligence - what is this? That is the question! In earlier...
research
09/16/2020

Are Interpretations Fairly Evaluated? A Definition Driven Pipeline for Post-Hoc Interpretability

Recent years have witnessed an increasing number of interpretation metho...
research
08/01/2019

General Information Theory: Time and Information

This paper introduces time into information theory, gives a more accurat...
research
04/11/2019

Defence Efficiency

In order to automate actions, such as defences against network attacks, ...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset