Numerical validation of probabilistic laws to evaluate finite element error estimates

11/23/2020
by   Joël Chaskalovic, et al.
0

We propose a numerical validation of a probabilistic approach applied to estimate the relative accuracy between two Lagrange finite elements P_k and P_m, (k<m). In particular, we show practical cases where finite element P_k gives more accurate results than finite element P_m. This illustrates the theoretical probabilistic framework we recently derived in order to evaluate the actual accuracy. This also highlights the importance of the extra caution required when comparing two numerical methods, since the classical results of error estimates concerns only the asymptotic convergence rate.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
11/23/2020

Generalized Beta Prime Distribution Applied to Finite Element Error Approximation

In this paper we propose a new generation of probability laws based on t...
research
08/11/2020

A General Superapproximation Result

A general superapproximation result is derived in this paper which is us...
research
10/29/2022

Weak Galerkin Finite Element Methods for Quad-Curl Problems

This article introduces a weak Galerkin (WG) finite element method for q...
research
02/21/2018

Comparative study of finite element methods using the Time-Accuracy-Size (TAS) spectrum analysis

We present a performance analysis appropriate for comparing algorithms u...
research
03/21/2020

A machine learning accelerated FE^2 homogenization algorithm for elastic solids

The FE^2 homogenization algorithm for multiscale modeling iterates betwe...
research
08/16/2018

Code generation for generally mapped finite elements

Many classical finite elements such as the Argyris and Bell elements hav...
research
12/17/2019

Balancing truncation and round-off errors in practical FEM: one-dimensional analysis

In finite element methods (FEMs), the accuracy of the solution cannot in...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset