Non-Evolutionary Superintelligences Do Nothing, Eventually

09/07/2016
by   Telmo Menezes, et al.
0

There is overwhelming evidence that human intelligence is a product of Darwinian evolution. Investigating the consequences of self-modification, and more precisely, the consequences of utility function self-modification, leads to the stronger claim that not only human, but any form of intelligence is ultimately only possible within evolutionary processes. Human-designed artificial intelligences can only remain stable until they discover how to manipulate their own utility function. By definition, a human designer cannot prevent a superhuman intelligence from modifying itself, even if protection mechanisms against this action are put in place. Without evolutionary pressure, sufficiently advanced artificial intelligences become inert by simplifying their own utility function. Within evolutionary processes, the implicit utility function is always reducible to persistence, and the control of superhuman intelligences embedded in evolutionary processes is not possible. Mechanisms against utility function self-modification are ultimately futile. Instead, scientific effort toward the mitigation of existential risks from the development of superintelligences should be in two directions: understanding consciousness, and the complex dynamics of evolutionary systems.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
06/01/2011

Evolution of Things

Evolution is one of the major omnipresent powers in the universe that ha...
research
02/28/2022

Curb Your Self-Modifying Code

Self-modifying code has many intriguing applications in a broad range of...
research
03/31/2020

Mimicking Evolution with Reinforcement Learning

Evolution gave rise to human and animal intelligence here on Earth. We a...
research
04/08/2022

Utility Functions for Human/Robot Interaction

In this paper, we place ourselves in the context of human robot interact...
research
05/05/2010

The Production of Probabilistic Entropy in Structure/Action Contingency Relations

Luhmann (1984) defined society as a communication system which is struct...
research
02/27/2017

Don't Fear the Reaper: Refuting Bostrom's Superintelligence Argument

In recent years prominent intellectuals have raised ethical concerns abo...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset