No speedup for geometric theories

05/10/2021
by   Michael Rathjen, et al.
0

Geometric theories based on classical logic are conservative over their intuitionistic counterparts for geometric implications. The latter result (sometimes referred to as Barr's theorem) is squarely a consequence of Gentzen's Hauptsatz. Prima facie though, cut elimination can result in superexponentially longer proofs. In this paper it is shown that the transformation of a classical proof of a geometric implication in a geometric theory into an intuitionistic proof can be achieved in feasibly many steps.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
04/23/2020

Proof Theory of Riesz Spaces and Modal Riesz Spaces

We design hypersequent calculus proof systems for the theories of Riesz ...
research
04/14/2022

Combining First-Order Classical and Intuitionistic Logic

This paper studies a first-order expansion of a combination C+J of intui...
research
01/03/2022

Online Generation of Proofs Without Words

Understanding geometric relationships with little mathematical knowledge...
research
04/25/2021

Isabelle's Metalogic: Formalization and Proof Checker

Isabelle is a generic theorem prover with a fragment of higher-order log...
research
12/10/2021

Semantic Cut Elimination for the Logic of Bunched Implications, Formalized in Coq

The logic of bunched implications (BI) is a substructural logic that for...
research
08/09/2020

The New Normal: We Cannot Eliminate Cuts in Coinductive Calculi, But We Can Explore Them

In sequent calculi, cut elimination is a property that guarantees that a...
research
05/02/2023

On the convergence of reduction-based and model-based methods in proof theory

In the recent past, the reduction-based and the model-based methods to p...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset