More style, less work: card-style data decrease risk-limiting audit sample sizes

by   Amanda K. Glazer, et al.

U.S. elections rely heavily on computers such as voter registration databases, electronic pollbooks, voting machines, scanners, tabulators, and results reporting websites. These introduce digital threats to election outcomes. Risk-limiting audits (RLAs) mitigate threats to some of these systems by manually inspecting random samples of ballot cards. RLAs have a large chance of correcting wrong outcomes (by conducting a full manual tabulation of a trustworthy record of the votes), but can save labor when reported outcomes are correct. This efficiency is eroded when sampling cannot be targeted to ballot cards that contain the contest(s) under audit. If the sample is drawn from all cast cards, RLA sample sizes scale like the reciprocal of the fraction of ballot cards that contain the contest(s) under audit. That fraction shrinks as the number of cards per ballot grows (i.e., when elections contain more contests) and as the fraction of ballots that contain the contest decreases (i.e., when a smaller percentage of voters are eligible to vote in the contest). States that conduct RLAs of contests on multi-card ballots or of small contests can dramatically reduce sample sizes by using information about which ballot cards contain which contests – by keeping track of card-style data (CSD). For instance, CSD reduces the expected number of draws needed to audit a single countywide contest on a 4-card ballot by 75 reduces the expected number of draws by 95 contests with the same margin on a 4-card ballot if one contest is on every ballot and the other is on 10 can be several orders of magnitude.



There are no comments yet.


page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4


Risk-Limiting Audits for IRV Elections

Risk-limiting post election audits guarantee a high probability of corre...

Bernoulli Ballot Polling: A Manifest Improvement for Risk-Limiting Audits

We present a method and software for ballot-polling risk-limiting audits...

Risk-Limiting Audits by Stratified Union-Intersection Tests of Elections (SUITE)

Risk-limiting audits (RLAs) offer a statistical guarantee: if a full man...

ALPHA: Audit that Learns from Previously Hand-Audited Ballots

BRAVO, the most widely tried method for risk-limiting election audits, c...

Bayesian Tabulation Audits: Explained and Extended

Tabulation audits for an election provide statistical evidence that a re...

Risk-Limiting Tallies

Many voter-verifiable, coercion-resistant schemes have been proposed, bu...

When are Deep Networks really better than Random Forests at small sample sizes?

Random forests (RF) and deep networks (DN) are two of the most popular m...
This week in AI

Get the week's most popular data science and artificial intelligence research sent straight to your inbox every Saturday.