Misplaced Confidence in Observed Power

07/18/2019
by   Zad R. Chow, et al.
0

A recently published randomized controlled trial in JAMA investigated the impact of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, escitalopram, on the risk of major adverse events (MACE). The authors estimated a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.69 and further calculated how much statistical power their test had, using this to assess how reliable their results were. Here, we discuss why this approach is highly misleading.

READ FULL TEXT
research
01/02/2021

A statistical method for estimating the no-observed-adverse-event-level

In toxicological risk assessment the benchmark dose (BMD) is recommended...
research
01/16/2020

Estimating and comparing adverse event probabilities in the presence of varying follow-up times and competing events

Safety analyses in terms of adverse events (AEs) are an important aspect...
research
09/18/2018

Testing Selective Influence Directly Using Trackball Movement Tasks

Systems factorial technology (SFT; Townsend & Nozawa, 1995) is regarded ...
research
06/29/2023

Integrating Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial Data with External Controls: A Semiparametric Approach with Selective Borrowing

In recent years, real-world external controls (ECs) have grown in popula...
research
07/12/2021

Assessment of Immune Correlates of Protection via Controlled Vaccine Efficacy and Controlled Risk

Immune correlates of protection (CoPs) are immunologic biomarkers accept...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset