DeepAI AI Chat
Log In Sign Up

Mimicry Is Presidential: Linguistic Style Matching in Presidential Debates and Improved Polling Numbers

by   Daniel M. Romero, et al.

The current research used the contexts of U.S. presidential debates and negotiations to examine whether matching the linguistic style of an opponent in a two-party exchange affects the reactions of third-party observers. Building off communication accommodation theory (CAT), interaction alignment theory (IAT), and processing fluency, we propose that language style matching (LSM) will improve subsequent third-party evaluations because matching an opponent's linguistic style reflects greater perspective taking and will make one's arguments easier to process. In contrast, research on status inferences predicts that LSM will negatively impact third-party evaluations because LSM implies followership. We conduct two studies to test these competing hypotheses. Study 1 analyzed transcripts of U.S. presidential debates between 1976 and 2012 and found that candidates who matched their opponent's linguistic style increased their standing in the polls. Study 2 demonstrated a causal relationship between LSM and third-party observer evaluations using negotiation transcripts.


page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4


Winning on the Merits: The Joint Effects of Content and Style on Debate Outcomes

Debate and deliberation play essential roles in politics and government,...

Open-Mindedness and Style Coordination in Argumentative Discussions

Linguistic accommodation is the process in which speakers adjust their a...

Cross-status Communication and Project Outcomesin OSS Development A Language Style Matching Perspective

The success of an open source software (OSS) project requires effective ...

How Good Is a Two-Party Election Game?

In this paper, we propose a simple and intuitive model to investigate th...

Smells like Teen Spirit: An Exploration of Sensorial Style in Literary Genres

It is well recognized that sensory perceptions and language have interco...

Style, Content, and the Success of Ideas

Why do some things succeed in the marketplace of ideas? While some argue...