Measuring Inconsistency in Argument Graphs

08/09/2017
by   Anthony Hunter, et al.
0

There have been a number of developments in measuring inconsistency in logic-based representations of knowledge. In contrast, the development of inconsistency measures for computational models of argument has been limited. To address this shortcoming, this paper provides a general framework for measuring inconsistency in abstract argumentation, together with some proposals for specific measures, and a consideration of measuring inconsistency in logic-based instantiations of argument graphs, including a review of some existing proposals and a consideration of how existing logic-based measures of inconsistency can be applied.

READ FULL TEXT
research
06/14/2022

Measuring Inconsistency in Declarative Process Specifications

We address the problem of measuring inconsistency in declarative process...
research
12/24/2015

Measuring pattern retention in anonymized data -- where one measure is not enough

In this paper, we explore how modifying data to preserve privacy affects...
research
11/29/2011

Dynamics of Knowledge in DeLP through Argument Theory Change

This article is devoted to the study of methods to change defeasible log...
research
04/28/2014

Credulous and Skeptical Argument Games for Complete Semantics in Conflict Resolution based Argumentation

Argumentation is one of the most popular approaches of defining a non-mo...
research
03/06/2013

Argumentation as a General Framework for Uncertain Reasoning

Argumentation is the process of constructing arguments about proposition...
research
09/27/2022

Static Knowledge vs. Dynamic Argumentation: A Dual Theory Based on Kripke Semantics

This paper establishes a dual theory about knowledge and argumentation. ...
research
11/08/2017

A Dynamic Solution to the Puzzle of Sea Battle

The puzzle of sea battle involves an argument that is an instantiation o...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset