Measurement Error in Nutritional Epidemiology: A Survey

04/14/2020
by   Huimin Peng, et al.
0

This article reviews bias-correction models for measurement error of exposure variables in the field of nutritional epidemiology. Measurement error usually attenuates estimated slope towards zero. Due to the influence of measurement error, inference of parameter estimate is conservative and confidence interval of the slope parameter is too narrow. Bias-correction in estimators and confidence intervals are of primary interest. We review the following bias-correction models: regression calibration methods, likelihood based models, missing data models, simulation based methods, nonparametric models and sampling based procedures.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
09/26/2021

Adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis via inverse probability weighting using clinical trial registries

Publication bias is a major concern in conducting systematic reviews and...
research
04/27/2022

Modeling complex measurement error in microbiome experiments

The relative abundances of species in a microbiome is a scientifically i...
research
08/01/2019

Bias Correction and Robust Inference in Semiparametric Models

This paper analyzes several different biases that emerge from the (possi...
research
11/02/2019

Correcting for attenuation due to measurement error

I present a frequentist method for quantifying uncertainty when correcti...
research
11/04/2021

Nonparametric Simulation Extrapolation for Measurement Error Models

The presence of measurement error is a widespread issue which, when igno...
research
07/08/2018

Measurement Errors as Bad Leverage Points

Errors-in-variables is a long-standing, difficult issue in linear regres...
research
04/24/2018

Differences of Type I error rates using SAS and SPSS for repeated measures designs

We examined Type I error rates of Multilevel Linear Models (MLM) and rep...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset