Maximization of Relative Social Welfare on Truthful Cardinal Voting Schemes

04/01/2019
by   Sinya Lee, et al.
0

Consider the the problem of maximizing the relative social welfare of truthful single-winner voting schemes with cardinal preferences compared to the classical range voting scheme. The range voting scheme is a simple and straightforward mechanism which deterministically maximizes the social welfare. However, the scheme that is known to be non-truthful and we studied the truthful mechanism that maximize the ratio of its expected social welfare to the social welfare achieved by the range voting scheme. We provide a scheme which achieve a ratio of Ω(m^-2/3) in this paper. It is proved that this bound is tight asymptotically and it is impossible to find a better voting scheme.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
04/22/2022

Welfare effects of strategic voting under scoring rules

Strategic voting, or manipulation, is the process by which a voter misre...
research
08/22/2021

Data Justice in Digital Social Welfare: A Study of the Rythu Bharosa Scheme

While digital social protection systems have been claimed to bring effic...
research
07/30/2020

Social Choice Optimization

Social choice is the theory about collective decision towards social wel...
research
06/18/2020

The Social Welfare Implications of the Zenga Index

We introduce the social welfare implications of the Zenga index, a recen...
research
05/09/2023

An Evaluation and Ranking of Different Voting Schemes for Improved Visual Place Recognition

Visual Place Recognition has recently seen a surge of endeavours utilizi...
research
03/23/2021

Taming Time-Varying Information Asymmetry in Fresh Status Acquisition

Many online platforms are providing valuable real-time contents (e.g., t...
research
10/17/2022

Sequential Elimination Voting Games

Voting by sequential elimination is a low-communication voting protocol:...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset