Mathematicians take a stand

04/05/2012
by   Douglas N. Arnold, et al.
0

We survey the reasons for the ongoing boycott of the publisher Elsevier. We examine Elsevier's pricing and bundling policies, restrictions on dissemination by authors, and lapses in ethics and peer review, and we conclude with thoughts about the future of mathematical publishing.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
04/07/2017

What Constitutes Peer Review of Data: A survey of published peer review guidelines

Since a number of journals specifically focus on the review and publicat...
research
10/05/2022

Manipulation and Peer Mechanisms: A Survey

In peer mechanisms, the competitors for a prize also determine who wins....
research
08/08/2023

Safeguarding Scientific Integrity: Examining Conflicts of Interest in the Peer Review Process

This case study analyzes the expertise, potential conflicts of interest,...
research
09/09/2020

A Survey on Data Pricing: from Economics to Data Science

Data are invaluable. How can we assess the value of data objectively, sy...
research
05/02/2022

What Factors Should Paper-Reviewer Assignments Rely On? Community Perspectives on Issues and Ideals in Conference Peer-Review

Both scientific progress and individual researcher careers depend on the...
research
06/08/2023

Modern Data Pricing Models: Taxonomy and Comprehensive Survey

Data play an increasingly important role in smart data analytics, which ...
research
10/03/2022

How many submissions does it take to discover friendly suggested reviewers?

It is ever more common in scientific publishing to ask authors to sugges...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset